Legal Opinion

Conklin v. United Construction & Supply Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Roland R. Conklin, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 7th day of April, 1914, upon the decision of the court after a trial at the New York Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits, in an action wherein three separate actions were consolidated, the relief prayed for being: First. The cancellation as void of certain stock issued by the defendant corporation to the defendant Jarvis. Second. An accounting between the defendant company and the plaintiff, and compelling the defendant Jarvis to repay to the company certain dividends paid to him. Third. To impress a trust on certain moneys and securities paid by the company to Jarvis as a dividend.

J arvis and Conklin originally became associated in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stokes v. . Continental Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Dusenberry v. Sagamore Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Greenbaum v. American Metal, Climax, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  2. Katzowitz v. SidlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Seaman v. Ironwood Amusement Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Schramme v. CowinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API