Legal Opinion
State v. Canedo-Astorga
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 16, 1995No. 17150-3-II, 17282-8-IIPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.
Jesus Canedo-Astorga (hereafter Cañedo) and Roger Ramon Naranjo appeal their convictions for delivery of cocaine. We affirm.
On February 4, 1993, the State charged Cañedo and Naranjo with delivery of cocaine. The court appointed attorney Lawler to represent Cañedo, and attorney Randolph to represent Naranjo.
On March 17, 1993, Cañedo moved for a new attorney. At the same time, Lawler moved to withdraw, asserting that communication with his client was "impossible.” The court denied both motions.
On March 22, 1993, Randolph moved to withdraw as Naranjo’s attorney, because he had formerly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. GrisbyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. DeWeeseWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. Charles Wesley Arlt, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. CarruthersTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. EmeryWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. SublettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. AsaeliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. AsaeliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.