Legal Opinion

State v. Meekins

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 19, 2005No. 29765-5-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Morgan, A.C.J.

— Leon Edward Meekins appeals his conviction for vehicular homicide. He argues (1) that the trial court instructed improperly on causation; (2) that he should have been allowed to show that the victim, a motorcycle rider, probably would not have died if he had been wearing a helmet; (3) that the evidence is insufficient to show that the victim died from injuries suffered in the accident; and (4) that a blood test was admitted without proper foundation. We reverse and remand.

¶2 Around dusk on May 31, 2001, Leon Edward Meekins was driving home after eating at a restaurant in…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. Fernandez-MedinaWashington Supreme Court · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Mee Hui KimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. State v. Mee Hui KimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. State v. ChristmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. State v. ImokawaWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State Of Washington v. Joshua C. FrahmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API