Legal Opinion

Custer v. Cerro Flow Products, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 18, 2018No. 5–16–0161UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cates

¶ 1 Defendant, Cerro Flow Products, Inc. (Cerro), appeals from orders of the circuit court finding that an aggregate settlement agreement between 11,546 plaintiffs and defendants-Pharmacia Corporation, now known as Pharmacia LLC; Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC; Solutia, Inc.; Monsanto Company; Monsanto AG Products LLC, now known as Monsanto Company; and Eastman Chemical Company (collectively referred to as "Monsanto defendants")-was made in "good faith," within the meaning of the Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Act (Contribution Act) ( 740 ILCS 100/0.01 et seq. (West 2014) ). For the following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Babb v. City of ChampaignIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Johnson v. United AirlinesIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re DoyleIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Knisley v. City of JacksonvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Lard v. AM/FM OHIO, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Custer v. Cerro Flow Products, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  2. Schramm v. Peregrine Transportation Company, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API