Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Excise Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 19, 1933No. 24603PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeNEILL, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Tax Review rendered against the plaintiff in error, the Chicago, Rock Island, & Pacific Railway Company, denying its protest against the action of the excise board of Canadian county in failing to use the sum of $10,-972.33, cash on hand in the city's funds known as a special improvement guaranty fund, in reducing the tax levy for sinking-fund for the city of El Reno for the fiscal year 1982-1983. For said fiscal year the excise board made no general fund levy, but made a sinking fund levy of 15.07 mills.

At the trial of the case, the parties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. City of El Reno v. Cleveland-Trinidad Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Shultz v. Ritterbusch, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Protest of BledsoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Ritterbusch v. HavinghorstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bray v. Department of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bray v. Department of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API