Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Cannon

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided September 24, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The contest is between the administratrix of the insured and The Del-Mar-Va Mortgage Company. The latter’s rights are derived through Mattie M. Cannon.

*272The question is—Did the insured, as against Mattie M. Cannon, effect a change of beneficiary under the policy?

That the change was- not made in strict conformity with the terms of the policy is clear, for the application was not accompanied by the policy. If the suit were one at law by the insured’s administratrix against the company, the latter would doubtless have the right to insist that no change of beneficiary had been made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Supreme Tent, Knights of the Maccabees of the World v. AltmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. O'Donnell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1915
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Delaware · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bowser v. BowserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. New York Life Insurance Company v. LawsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  3. Gill v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. SHENANDOAH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HarveyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965
  5. Kurgan v. Prudential InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API