Legal Opinion
Recreation Centers of Sun City, Inc. v. Maricopa County
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1989No. CV-87-0087-PRPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Maricopa County and the Department of Revenue (“department”) petition this court to review a court of appeals decision holding that a deed restriction on property owned by Recreation Centers of Sun City, Inc. (“Rec Centers”) destroyed the property’s value for tax purposes. See Recreation Centers of Sun City, Inc. v. Marico-pa County, 162 Ariz. 277, 782 P.2d 1170 (App.1986). We granted review because issues pertaining to the proper method of assessing use restricted property are of *283statewide importance. See Rule 23 Ariz. R.Civ.App.P. 17B A.R.S. We have jurisdiction…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Golder v. Department of Revenue, State Board of Tax AppealsArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- People ex rel. New York Stock Exchange Building Co. v. CantorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Assessors of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Swan Lake Moulding Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- People Ex Rel. New York Stock Exchange Building Co. v. CantorNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Basin Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- BREEZY KNOLL ASS'N. v. Town of MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Eurofresh, Inc. v. Graham CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Sun City Summerlin Community Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. Department of TaxationNevada Supreme Court · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.