Legal Opinion

Christensen v. City of Tekamah

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1988No. 88-425PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This action was commenced to obtain a declaratory judgment that ordinance No. 852 of the City of Tekamah, Nebraska, which created sanitary sewer extension district No. 86-1, was void because it failed to state the outer boundaries of the district. The plaintiffs alleged the description contained in the ordinance was so defective that it “does not identify nor furnish the means of identifying the property to be included in the district.” The plaintiffs also sought to enjoin the city from collecting special assessments levied under the ordinance and from taking any action requiring the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Niklaus v. Abel Construction CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Nebco, Inc. v. SpeedlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Miner v. City of YonkersNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hansen v. City of NorfolkNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Aldridge v. School Dist. of North PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Iverson v. City of North PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API