Legal Opinion
Nolan v. Audubon Insurance Group
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 9, 2011No. CA 10-1362PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EZELL, Judge.
| T Robert and Tabatha Nolan (the No-lans) appeal a decision of the trial court granting a motion for concursus in favor of Audubon Insurance Company. The No-lans also appeal the trial court’s refusal to award them penalties arising from Audubon’s alleged failure to pay a settlement under La.R.S. 22:1973. For the following reasons, we hereby affirm the decision of the trial court.
The Nolans obtained a homeowners’ insurance policy from Audubon for their former home in Branch, Louisiana. Two mortgage companies, Aurora Loan Service and Encore Credit Corporation (the mortgagees),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Hart v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Sultana Corp. v. Jewelers Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Cimarex Energy Co. v. MauboulesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- Landry & Passman Rlty., Inc. v. BEADLE, S., W. & A., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holt v. Ace American Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Fieldwood Energy LLC and The Official Committee of Unsecured CreditorsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2022
- Instant Replay Sports, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Instant Replay Sports, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Instant Replay Sports, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.