Legal Opinion

Cimarex Energy Co. v. Mauboules

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 9, 2010No. 2009-C-1170, 2009-C-1180, 2009-C-1194PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.*

11 This case arises out of a dispute involving royalty payments due under a mineral lease held by applicants, Cimarex Energy Co., Ceniarth, Ltd., Palace Exploration Co., and RZ, Inc. (hereinafter “Cimarex”). Alleging that there were competing claims to the royalty payments, Cimarex invoked a concursus proceeding and deposited the funds into the registry of the court. We granted this writ application primarily to review the lower courts’ rulings that Cima-rex had no reasonable basis to invoke a concursus proceeding in this case, and thereby unreasonably withheld royalty…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Camel v. WallerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  2. Phillips v. ParkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  3. City of New Orleans v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, Division of Health v. Career Service Commission of Florida Department of AdministrationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Landry & Passman Rlty., Inc. v. BEADLE, S., W. & A., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. In re the Succession of BeardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. O'Krepki v. O'KrepkiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. FMC Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Prytania-St. Mary Condominiums Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Gloria's Ranch, L.L.C. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc., Cubic Energy, Inc., Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc., and Exco USA Asset, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2018
  5. Carr v. Oaktree ApartmentsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API