Cimarex Energy Co. v. Mauboules
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.*
11 This case arises out of a dispute involving royalty payments due under a mineral lease held by applicants, Cimarex Energy Co., Ceniarth, Ltd., Palace Exploration Co., and RZ, Inc. (hereinafter “Cimarex”). Alleging that there were competing claims to the royalty payments, Cimarex invoked a concursus proceeding and deposited the funds into the registry of the court. We granted this writ application primarily to review the lower courts’ rulings that Cima-rex had no reasonable basis to invoke a concursus proceeding in this case, and thereby unreasonably withheld royalty…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Camel v. WallerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- Phillips v. ParkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- City of New Orleans v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, Division of Health v. Career Service Commission of Florida Department of AdministrationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Landry & Passman Rlty., Inc. v. BEADLE, S., W. & A., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- In re the Succession of BeardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- O'Krepki v. O'KrepkiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- FMC Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Prytania-St. Mary Condominiums Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Gloria's Ranch, L.L.C. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc., Cubic Energy, Inc., Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc., and Exco USA Asset, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2018
- Carr v. Oaktree ApartmentsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.