Legal Opinion

Godinez v. Russo

New York City Family Court

Decided January 19, 1966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorrie Slifkin, J.

These are two paternity proceedings affecting the two children of the parties, the hearing upon which has been consolidated for the purposes of this decision.

The respondent, Donald Eusso, has admitted paternity of both of the children, and an order of filiation is directed to be entered.

The respondent, however, has filed an application with the court wherein he requests that an order should be entered herein directing that custody of the two children of the parties be awarded to him as their putative father.

In custody proceedings concerning a child born in wedlock, the courts of this State…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Matter of LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. People Ex Rel. Meredith v. MeredithNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Matter of Bock (Breitung)New York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. In re AnonymousNew York Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cornell v. HartleyNew York City Family Court · 1967
  2. Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York City Family Court · 1968
  3. Merrick v. MerrickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  4. Boatwright v. OteroNew York Family Court · 1977
  5. Stone v. ChipNew York City Family Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API