Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Britsch

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 5, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

The application for an order vacating notice of taking deposition is denied. I hold that an examination before trial of an executor, sought to be removed, may be had in this court. The main issue directed to be heard and determined in the present proceeding is whether or not the executor and trustee should be removed. For the purpose of expediting the trial of the serious charges made against the executor, my intermediate order directed that the issue of revocation be tried in advance of the accounting, although both forms of relief were demanded in a single proceeding. Sections 288…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lewis v. . FowlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. In re the Estate of HodgmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1920
  3. Scheff v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of EbbetsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of Van ValkenburghNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Van VolkenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. In re the Accounting of MootNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
  5. In re the Estate of CoyleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API