Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Coyle

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 27, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn J. McCall, J.

There is before the court a motion for on order of protection with respect to notices received by the respondent objectants to examine the petitioners before trial. The examination sought was with respect to evidence material and necessary in the prosecution of the objections filed to the petitioners’ accounts. There was a notice to produce all records relating to all transactions relating to the administration of the estate.

On October 31, 1968, the respondents conducted a full examination of the accounting executors pursuant to the provisions of SCPA 2211 and said petitioners were questioned…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of Van ValkenburghNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  2. In re the Estate of BritschNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
  3. In re the Accounting of MootNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
  4. In re the Accounting of WexlerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
  5. In re the Intermediate Accounting of FriedmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re HambletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re the Estate of MeislerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977
  3. In re the Estate of DormanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API