Legal Opinion

Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Coulter

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1907No. 4873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Garfield County. Hon. A. L. Beardsley, Judge. Action by A. L. Coulter against The Denver & Eio Grande Eailroad Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

delivered -the opinion of the court:

This was .an action commenced in the justice court by the appellee against appellant to recover damages for the alleged hilling of a cow. Prom a judgment rendered by the justice of the peace the defendant appealed to the county court of Garfield county. The plaintiff elected to prosecute the action under the common law, so that none of the statutes concerning the killing of stock by railroads are involved.

■Plaintiff was the only witness who testified in the case. He said that a section man told him there was a cow knocked off the track and for him to look…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. AdcockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. RhodesColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. RhodesColorado Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API