Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1906No. 5015; C. A. No. 2565PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Weld County. Hon. John T. Jacobs, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goddard

This.is an action to recover the value of a horse alleged to have been killed through the negligent operation of a train of cars by the engineer of the appellant. Judgment in favor of appellee for $100 and costs. Appellant brings the case here for review.

On September 20, 1893, the appellee (plaintiff below) found a horse that belonged to him lying-dead by the side of the defendant’s railroad track, partially buried, with severe bruises upon his right shoulder and other portions of the body, at the foot of an embankment or fill on which the railroad track of appellant was located, about 1,500…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lomer v. . MeekerNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Evans v. GeorgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. WalthourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Railway v. ShoecraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. CoulterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  2. Grandell v. TylerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Grandell v. TylerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API