Braden v. RLI Insurance Company
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RICHARD BRADEN, et al., Case No. 24-cv-04599-JSC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION 9 v. TO DISMISS 10 RLI INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 9 Defendant. 11 12 13 Plaintiffs allege Defendant owes a duty to defend them in a pending civil action under an 14 insurance policy to which Plaintiffs are beneficiaries. Defendant moves to dismiss on the grounds 15 Plaintiffs’ claimed relief is barred by an insurance policy exclusion. (Dkt. No. 9.)1 Having 16 carefully reviewed the parties’ briefing, and with the benefit of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.