Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nina M. v. Otsego County Social Services Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1994Published

1Dissent

White, J. (dissenting). I

respectfully dissent. While not denominated as such, plaintiffs application was one for preaction disclosure under CPLR 3102 (c). In order to obtain this relief, it was incumbent upon plaintiff to demonstrate that she had a prima facie cause of action (see, Matter of Hughes v Witco Corp.-Chemprene Div., 175 AD2d 486, 487). The imposition of this burden upon plaintiff is particularly appropriate in light of the State’s interest in finalizing adoption proceedings so that the parties, and especially the child, can go forward with their lives secure in the certainty that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robert O. v. Russell K.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. In re Sarah K.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Hughes v. Witco Corp.-Chemprene DivisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API