Legal Opinion

Hooks v. Hooks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 23, 1948No. 6 Div. 786PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

This is a bill for divorce. It appears from 'the allegations of the bill that complainant and respondent are both residents of the State of Alabama. When this is the situation, divorce proceedings should be filed either in the county where the respondent resides or in the county where the parties resided when the separation occurred. Section 28, Title 34, Code of 1940; Puckett et al. v. Puckett, 174 Ala. 315, 56 So. 585; Hammons v. Hammons, 228 Ala. 264, 153 So. 210.

Section 28, Title 34, supra, however, has been held to be for the benefit of the parties and may be waived. It…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hammons v. HammonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Harwell v. Lehman, Durr & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Pucket v. PucketSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Lewis v. ElrodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  5. Kyser v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Ramsey v. RamseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  3. Kemp v. KempSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Melton v. MeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. Sanders v. Swaney (Ex parte Swaney)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API