Legal Opinion

Fruehauf Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 13, 1973No. 91-70; No. 191-71PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoweN, Chief Judge

These actions for the refund of income taxes present another of the perplexing questions that often arise with respect to the computation of interest under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The cases were argued together because Count I of Fruehauf’s petition and Metro-Goldwyn-*369Mayer’s petition involve similar questions of law and fact. These issues relate to the assessment of interest on potential corporate tax deficiencies and the awarding of interest on corporate tax overpayments. Specifically, we are called upon to decide the proper methods by which to set off the overpay-ments…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Northern Natural Gas Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. Commercial Solvents Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. Citadel Industries, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  5. James W. Kindelan and Mary Kindelan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ottawa Silica Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Forward Communications Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  4. Sun Chemical Corp., a Delaware Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Cook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API