Legal Opinion

Cook v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 18, 1979No. 442-75PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge

This case revolves around the application of the foreign-income exclusion provided by section 911 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 911, to the work of an American artist residing and creating abroad. Plaintiff Robert H. Cook, a United States citizen, is a sculptor, long-resident in Rome, Italy, who works in bronze.1 Essentially, he uses a lost wax process, making a model of the sculpture in beeswax reinforced by strips of bamboo. The model is then taken to an outside foundry where it is cast in bronze. Mr. Cook creates his sculptures in his studio in Rome, and then sells them on a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Real Estate - Land Title & Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. Anne Moen Bullitt Biddle Brewster v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Ottawa Silica Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Considine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Groetzinger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  5. Aetna Life Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API