Dalton v. State
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*656¶1
Kurtz, J.
— In this appeal, the appellants vigorously dispute the trial court’s findings and, accordingly, ask us to reverse its order granting the respondents’ CR 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. The trial court chose to believe a declarant who testified that her written statement had been changed after she signed it. There was other evidence that indicated otherwise. But, as the court has often stated, “an appellate tribunal is not permitted to weigh the evidence or the credibility of the witnesses.” Vermette v. Andersen, 16 Wn. App. 466, 470, 558 P.2d 258 (1976). We have no role of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Assmann v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Marshall v. AC & S, INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- In re the Marriage of SchweitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Matter of Marriage of SchweitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cantu v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Cantu v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Wimberly v. CaravelloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Dalton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Damian Schwarz v. Susan M. SchwarzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.