Legal Opinion
Marshall v. AC & S, INC.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 11, 1989No. 22129-9-IPublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Per curiam
James S. Marshall appeals from a trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of the respondents, a group of asbestos manufacturers. A Commissioner granted a court's motion on the merits pursuant to RAP 18.14. Marshall has moved to modify the Commissioner's ruling. We grant the motion to modify only for the purpose of adopting the Commissioner's analysis in this published opinion.
Marshall was exposed to asbestos products while employed at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in the 1950's. Some 25 years later he suffered from a lingering cough and lung congestion which caused him to visit a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Van T. Junkins and Associates, Inc., an Alabama Corporation v. U.S. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- William Radobenko and Mary G. Radobenko, His Wife, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Automated Equipment Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Hontz v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Overton v. Consolidated Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Overton v. Consolidated InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Unigard Insurance v. LevenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Marisa Bavand v. Onewest Bank FsbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Shelcusky v. GarjulioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.