Legal Opinion · Dissent

Weil v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1994No. S029652Published

1DissentMosk, J.

I dissent.

In my view we should grasp this opportunity to abrogate the archaic and arcane distinction between “accidental death” and “death by accidental means,” and thereby join the modern trend in the majority of our sister states which have either abolished the distinction or refused to recognize it in the first place. I further believe that we should adopt an analysis recently devised by the federal courts for determining when a death is “accidental” for insurance law purposes, and that under that test the death of the insured herein was accidental and his beneficiaries are entitled to…

2Cases cited123 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API