Willingham v. Wesley Hardware Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
Suit by appellee upon an account, which is in Code form, and under our uniform rulings was not subject to defendant’s demurrer. Code, § 9531; Mann v. Butcher, 211 Ala. 669, 101 So. 595.
The plaintiff’s replications 1 to 4, inclusive, were neither frivolous nor irrelevant, and therefore the eourt properly overruled defendant’s motion to strike the same. Motion to strike is not the proper method of testing the sufficiency of a plea or replication. John Dodd Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Burt, 225 Ala. 438, 143 So. 832; Ashurst v. Arnold-Henegar-Doyle Co., 201 Ala. 480, 78 So. 386;…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wilson v. New United States Cattle-Ranch Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Tillis v. Smith Sons Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Parker v. BondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Mobile Electric Co. v. SangesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roan v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Real Coal, Inc. v. Thompson Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Bradford v. Moore Brothers Feed and GrocerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Webb v. LitzAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
- Creamery Package Mfg. Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.