Legal Opinion
Williams v. Imhoff
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 14, 2000No. 98-1448, 98-1449, 98-1450, 98-1454 and 98-1456PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Walter F. Imhoff, Gary J. Wilson, Richard T. Huebner, and George A. Johnson appeal from the district court’s partial denial of their motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings. At issue is the arbitrability of claims asserted under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, by plaintiffs, former securities exchange employees who were terminated from their employment by defendants and who allegedly did not receive proper valuation for stock held in their former employer’s profit sharing plan. We exercise…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Pritzker v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Image Software, Inc. v. Reynolds & Reynolds Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Belnap v. Iasis HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Spahr Ex Rel. Spahr v. SeccoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- American Heritage Life Insurance Company v. John D. OrrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- American Heritage Life Insurance v. OrrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.