Legal Opinion · Dissent

Albert v. Frisby v. General Stanley Larsen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 28, 1973No. 71-2771Published

1DissentJames M. Carter, Circuit Judge

This is an appeal from the district court’s grant of a writ of habeas corpus to an in-service conscientious objector. Frisby v. Larsen (N.D.Cal.1971) 330 F. Supp. 545. The majority has sustained the action of the district court.

*246Two principal questions are involved:(1) Was there a basis in fact for the military’s decision not to grant appellee Frisby a I-O classification, within five months of granting him a I-A-O [noncombatant] classification ?(2) May demeanor evidence alone provide a basis in fact?

Respectfully disagreeing with the majority, I dissent and would reverse, answering both…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. Lonnie Leroy HaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Richard Secor Corliss, United States of America v. Fred August Heise, United States of America v. Walter HeroldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  5. American Motor Specialties Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API