Legal Opinion

United States v. Seward

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 30, 1998No. 97-1180; Crim.App. No. 32416PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Chief Judge:

Appellant originally was tried on May 16, 1996, by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members, but the military judge granted a defense motion for mistrial. Appellant had entered pleas to two specifications of wrongful appropriation, Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921, and the Government was attempting to prove appellant guilty of the two greater specifications of larceny, as alleged on the charge sheet. The mistrial occurred during the close of the Government’s case-in-chief.

After the mistrial was declared,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. GorskiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  4. United States v. BoudreauxUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. PlattUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  3. United States v. GoodwinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  4. United States v. TooheyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  5. United States v. CabreraNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API