Brace v. Steele County
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
By this action, plaintiff is seeking to recover damages for the flooding of three- hundred fifty acres of land, which flooding he alleges was caused' by the construction, by the defendant, of a highway across a natural water course. Defendant’s answer is a general denial. Leave to intervene as a party defendant was granted to the State of North Dakota and an answer'in intervention has been filed. After the action had been noticed for trial, plaintiff moved for a change of place of trial, upon the ground that-he could not have a fair and impartial trial in Steele County, the county in which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Booren v. McWilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Danger v. Courier NewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- Swiggum v. Valley Investment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Haugo v. HaalandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Linington v. McLean CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Hovland v. WallerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959