Legal Opinion

Brace v. Steele County

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1951No. File 7191PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

By this action, plaintiff is seeking to recover damages for the flooding of three- hundred fifty acres of land, which flooding he alleges was caused' by the construction, by the defendant, of a highway across a natural water course. Defendant’s answer is a general denial. Leave to intervene as a party defendant was granted to the State of North Dakota and an answer'in intervention has been filed. After the action had been noticed for trial, plaintiff moved for a change of place of trial, upon the ground that-he could not have a fair and impartial trial in Steele County, the county in which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Booren v. McWilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Danger v. Courier NewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Swiggum v. Valley Investment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Haugo v. HaalandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Linington v. McLean CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Hovland v. WallerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API