Mitchell v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Commissioner.
This is an action wherein the plaintiffs seek to recover damages for breach of an advertising contract. The advertisement in question was in the classified section of the defendant’s telephone directory. One of the telephone numbers in the advertisement was not the correct number, and the plaintiffs contended that they were damaged by the error to the extent of $3,741.08. The defendant counterclaimed for the contract price of two other advertisements which were correctly printed. One was in the East St. Louis classified directory and the contract price was $25; the other…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hazel B. McTighe v. New England Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Baird v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Faire v. BurkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Tnemec Company, Inc. v. North Kansas City Development Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Russell v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Warner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Gas House, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Wade v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- University Hills, Etc. v. Mountain States, Etc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.