The Sea Lion
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
KERRIGAN, District Judge.
This ease presents the already often considered question, whether or not by stipulation with a tow a tugboat can limit its liability for negligence. On exceptions to the libel,-1 Judge Partridge ruled that this should be determined only after all the facts had been brought before the court, and for that reason left it undecided.
In Alaska Commercial Co. v. Williams (C. C. A. 9) 128 F. 362, 366, 63 C. C. A. 92, relying upon The Steamer Syracuse) 12 Wall. 167, 20 L. Ed. 382, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the local circuit held that a towing Vessel could not relieve…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- The Steamer SyracuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- The OceanicaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
- The Clarence L. BlakesleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- The Edmund L. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Federal Steam Navigation Co. v. Tugs SavannahDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1969
- The White CityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Calzavaro v. Planet S. S. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.