Better Meat Co. v. Emergy, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 The Better Meat Co., No. 2:21-cv-02338-KJM-CKD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Emergy, Inc., et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Emergy, Inc., the defendant in this action, asserts several counterclaims against The Better 18 | Meat Co. and Augustus Pattillo. Better Meat and Pattillo seek summary judgment. The 19 | counterclaims fall into two broad groups: patents and trade secrets. As explained in this order, 20 | Emergy has not cited “particular parts of materials in the record” to support an essential part of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.