Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Hawthorn Bank

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 2017No. WD 79534Published

1Opinion of the CourtLisa White Hardwick, Judge

Laurie Freeman and Martin Reid (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal from the judgment in favor of Hawthorn Bank (“Hawthorn”) on their class action petition alleging that Hawthorn’s automated debit card overdraft program violates Missouri’s usury law. Appellants contend the circuit court erred in holding that Hawthorn’s debit card overdraft fee is a statutorily-permitted service charge imposed on a deposit account and, therefore, is not subject to the state’s usury law. For reasons explained herein, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural History

Hawthorn is a Missouri-chartered bank and member of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Missouri National Education Ass'n v. Missouri State Board of EducationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State Ex Rel. Ashcroft v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Dennis Fastnacht and Joni Fastnacht v. Teng GeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API