Legal Opinion

Higman v. Quindaro Township

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1914No. 18,431PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte court of common pleas; Hugh J. Smith, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Hannah C. Higman, the wife of appellant, fell into a ravine to which a long-traveled highway led. The culvert over the ravine had washed ■out and the township authorities moved the highway to one side about forty feet and made a new crossing over the ravine, leaving the old highway open for travel without any guard or barricade. On a dark night Mrs. Higman, who was unfamiliar with the conditions existing there, followed the old highway and fell into the ravine, suffering severe injuries. This action was brought by her husband to recover…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Powers v. Badger Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. SweetSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Cunningham v. PattersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Parr v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Higman v. Quindaro TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Wagner v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Springer v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Backstrom v. Ogallah TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Bishop v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API