Legal Opinion

Faucette v. Griffin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 3, 1978No. 771SC142PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Summary judgment is appropriate only when “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Rule 56(c). In an action to remove a cloud on title to real property the plaintiff assumes the burden of proving “a title good against the whole world or good against the defendant by estoppel.” Mobley v. Griffin, 104 N.C. 112, 114 (1889). To sustain this burden upon a motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Booth v. . HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Mansour v. RabilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Cruthis v. SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hi-Fort, Inc. v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API