Legal Opinion

Park House Partners, Ltd. v. DeIrazabal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 8, 1988PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Murphy, P. J.

This action seeking a declaration that the defendant tenant *85has not resided primarily at the subject rent-stabilized premises and is, therefore, not entitled to a renewal lease, was commenced by plaintiff landlord after only five months of the tenant’s recently renewed lease had elapsed. Although the tenant was provided with 30 days’ notice of the action which the landlord concedes is required by section 5 (a) (11) of the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 (L 1974, ch 576, § 4, as amended) and by section YY51-3.0 (a) (1) (f) of the Administrative Code of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MATTER OF 61 JANE ST. ASSOCS. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Cier Industries Co. v. HessenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Crow v. 83rd Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Metzendorf v. 130 West 57 Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Central Park South Associates v. HackelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Peck v. WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Steinmetz v. BarnettCivil Court of the City of New York · 1992
  3. Ansonia Associates v. ConsiglioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Ansonia Associates v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. 615 Co. v. MikeskaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API