Legal Opinion

Central Park South Associates v. Hackel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 29, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Blyn, J.), entered March 2, 1984, which granted defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) to dismiss the complaint, is reversed, on the law, and the motion denied, without costs.

Plaintiff is the owner and landlord of the premises at 240 Central Park South. Defendants are the tenants of record of apartment 14-F located in the subject premises. They entered into possession of the apartment pursuant to a lease for a term commencing March 1,1972 and terminating February 28,1974. The tenancy was extended by subsequent lease…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. WinshipNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. La Guardia v. CavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Axelrod v. StarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. MATTER OF E. 56TH PLAZA, INC. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Friedman v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Park House Partners, Ltd. v. DeIrazabalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Park South Associates v. MasonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1984
  3. Steinmetz v. BarnettCivil Court of the City of New York · 1992
  4. Limited v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Lizby Associates v. BaronNew York Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API