Legal Opinion

McQueen v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1981No. 2-378-A-71PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Pamela McQueen brought a civil action for damages against the City of Indianapolis, Joseph E. Knox, Eugene Smith, and Terry Brownlee alleging three different torts: 1) malicious prosecution, 2) false arrest or false imprisonment, and 3) abuse of process. The trial court granted defendants’ joint motion for judgment on the evidence after McQueen rested her case. On appeal, McQueen questions whether judgment on the evidence as to the malicious prosecution count was properly granted. 1

It was stated by this court in Geyer v. City of Logansport (2d Dist. 1976) Ind.App., 346 N.E.2d…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Miller v. GrieselIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Livingston v. Consolidated City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners of Hendricks County v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. FW Woolworth Co., Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Stolinski v. PennypackerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
  4. Kroger Food Stores, Inc. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Campbell v. El Dee Apartments & Criterion GroupIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API