Legal Opinion

Rene J. DeLorme, Inc. v. Union Square Agency, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1961No. Docket 40, Calendar 48,624PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

(for affirmance). Brought to us is a question of practice under Court Rule No 18, § 1 (d) (1945). Plaintiffs’ suit for damages, alleging an actionable breach of contract on the part of defendants, was met by successful motion of defendant Union Square Agency, Inc., to dismiss on ground of another action pending between the same parties for the same cause. The motion was properly verified, as required by the mentioned court rule. Plaintiffs responded with an “Answer to Motion” alleging that the 2 pending suits are not “for the same cause.” * They failed, however, to verify such answer under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chapple v. National Hardwood Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ross v. Onyx Oil & Gas Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Sovran Bank v. ParsonsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Township Oil Co. v. State BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Rowry v. University of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Rowry v. University of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API