Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Office of the Mayor of the District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 29, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2016-2049Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) CLARENCE JACKSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:16-cv-02049 (APM) ) OFFICE OF THE MAYOR OF THE ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Pro se Plaintiff Clarence Jackson alleges that Defendants Office of the Mayor of the District of Columbia and the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Committee on Admissions (“COA”) improperly denied him the opportunity to take the District of Columbia bar exam for a fifth time.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.