Legal Opinion

Gee v. Sherman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This is a suit to recover damages for the willful removal of timber from certain uncultivated land in New Madrid county, brought against P. F. Sherman, R. F. Sherman and P. F. Sherman, Jr., alleged to have been partners. Defendant, P. F. Sherman, filed a general denial, the other defendants failing to answer. The cause was tried before a jury resulting in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of six hundred seventeen and 50/100 dollars. Defendants have appealed.

Error is assigned in refusing an instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence and in the admission of evidence.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Krider v. MilnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Clark v. McAteeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. Proctor v. GarmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Houston & T. C. R. v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Simpson v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Koenig v. SkaggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  2. Cavaness v. ArmstrongMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. City of Marshfield v. HaggardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Peoples Bank v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Coleman v. FletcherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API