Legal Opinion

City of Marshfield v. Haggard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 1957No. 7646PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUARK, Judge.

This is a boundary line dispute in which the plaintiff-respondent city claims that the improvements of the defendant-appellant, who is owner of Block 5, Kentucky Row, Second Addition to Marshfield, intrude across and south of the north line of Bur-ford Street. The city relies upon two surveys (Rader and Neuhart) which put the north line of the street farther north than it is put by the survey (of Reed) upon which the defendant relies. The contention of the city is that the Reed survey is inaccurate in its northern call for distance. The claims of the defendant can be summarized…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. RipkaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Brady v. HymanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Landers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. City of Warsaw v. SwearnginSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Grimes v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ollison v. Village of Climax SpringsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Terry v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Cantrell v. Bank of Poplar BluffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Carender v. BarryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Curran v. BowenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API