Leffingwell v. Scutt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, J.
This is a taxpayer’s action under section 51 of the General Municipal Law to restrain any further payment on an illegal contract and to recover into the village treasury money already paid thereon. The defendants are the village of Watkins, its trustees and treasurer, and Barrows, Reeves and Pollard, doing business under the firm name of Ellsworth, Barrows & Reeves.
The trustees of the village passed a resolution to employ the defendants Barrows, Reeves and Pollard, whom we shall call the “ firm,” to make “ a blanket assessment for the board of assessors ” and to pay them therefor two-tenths…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Village of Fort Edward v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Ayers v. . LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Osterhoudt v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- People of the State of N.Y. v. . FieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Stetler v. . McFarlaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blanshard v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Knapp v. FasbenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Queens Park Gardens, Inc. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Bauer v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Knapp v. FasbenderNew York Court of Appeals · 1956