Legal Opinion

Bauer v. City of Niagara Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The city is prohibited by the Constitution from using its money for anything other than municipal purposes. (State Const, art. 8, § 2.) The provision of the City Charter if construed to give the city power to bid more than the amount of its tax liens for property for which it has no use, is certainly unconstitutional. When the bids for public property are more than the amount of its tax liens, the excess moneys are not used for city purposes. Especially is this so when…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Western New York Water Co. v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Olmsted v. . MeahlNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Daly v. HaightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. Daly v. . HaightNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Eastman Kodak Co. v. RichardsNew York Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blaikie v. LindsayNew York Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API