Nintendo of America, Inc. v. NTDEC
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BATTIN, Senior District Judge, Visiting.
An evidentiary hearing regarding damages in the above-captioned matter was held on March 30, 1993, before Senior United States District Judge James F. Battin. Notice was given to the defaulted Defendants but they failed to appear to rebut the testimony presented by Plaintiff Nintendo of America, Inc. (hereinafter “Nintendo”). The Court, having heard the testimony of the witnesses 1 and having reviewed the exhibits admitted into evidence, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rufus E. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, and Richard Eiden, Real-Party-In-Interest-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Jordan v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Dragon Pacific International George ShengCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994