Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Estate of Duffy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 14, 1940No. 45138Published

1DissentMitchell, J.

(dissenting) — I find myself unable to agree, and respectfully dissent.

The majority concede that an action to contest a will can only be brought by “one who would have a beneficial interest in the estate, if there was no such will.” (See In re Estate of Stewart, 107 Iowa 117, 77 N.W. 574.)

In the case at bar, if there was no last will and testament, the estate of the deceased would descend intestate. If the deceased died intestate the alleged lien of the appellant, which is purely a creature of the statute, (see Hunter v. Citizens Sav. and Trust Co., 157 Iowa 168, 138 N. W. 475, Ann. Cas.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Citizens Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Hemsted & Everson v. FerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Shepard's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Burk v. MorainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  5. Collins v. AhrensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API