Pratt v. Robert S. Odell & Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J. pro tem.
No objection can rightfully be made to the facts that but one notice of appeal was filed, one clerk’s and one reporter’s transcript certified, and that one set of briefs covers all the problems that the parties have presented, so long as it is kept clearly in mind that two distinct orders have been appealed from, made over a month apart and by different trial judges, and that the record before the one judge was quite different from that before the other. We shall follow the precedent set by the parties, by passing upon both appeals in one opinion, and that set by the trial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Dieterle v. BekinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Kellett v. KellettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Estate of RabinowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fletcher v. A. J. Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Franklin v. Nat C. Goldstone AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. CarusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Boyd v. Oscar Fisher Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Jeffers v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.