Legal Opinion

Heath v. Burnham-Munger-Root Dry Goods Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 17, 1918No. 9493PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Mayes County; Preston S. Davis, Judge. Suit by the Burnham-Munger-Root Dry Goods Company against Daisy B. Heath and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

The Reese Mercantile Company, a corporation, was engaged in the mercantile business at Strang, Okla. The plaintiffs in error and three others were stockholders in the corporation, and for several months next before June, 1913, dissensions arose among the stockholders and the corporation became in a bad financial condition. About that time a collector for the defendant in error, to whom the corporation was indebted, as evidenced by certain promissory notes of the corporations, visited the town of Strang for purpose of adjusting the indebtedness due his company by the said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunter Realty Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Powers v. RudeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  3. Tovera v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Horton v. BirdsongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. National Oil & Dev. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Home-Stake Royalty Corp. v. McClishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Equitable Royalty Corporation v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Yantis v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API