Legal Opinion
Haselden v. Home Insurance Co. of New York
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided January 17, 1933PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OpiNion op the Court by
Judge Richardson
Affirming.
The determinant question presented by this appeal is one of fact, and since the facts are not disputed, therefore it becomes one of law. Consolidated Coal Company y. Ratliff, 217 Ky. 103, 288 S. W. 1057; Warfield Natural Gas Co. v. Muncy, 244 Ky. 213, 50 S. W. (2d) 543.
On April 19, 1927, A. S. Haselden and Maymie Haselden were the owners of a house and lot situated in Lincoln county, Ky. They occupied it as a home, with their household and kitchen furniture. The Home Insurance Company of New York issued and .delivered to them a policy of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Germania Insurance v. RudwigCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882
- Niagara Fire Insurance v. LayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Niagara Fire Insurance Co. v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Aetna Life Insurance v. Bowling Green Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Phœnix Ins. v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Sun Indemnity Co. v. DulaneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. HurtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.