Legal Opinion

Harrah's Bossier City Investment Co. v. Bridges

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 2009No. 2008 CA 1727, 2008 CA 1728, 2008 CA 1729, 2008 CA 1730, 2008 CA 1731, 2008 CA 1732, 2008 CA 1733, 2008 CA 1734, 2008 CA 1735, 2008 CA 1736, 2008 CA 1737, 2008 CA 1738, 2008 CA 1739, 2008 CA 1740, 2008 CA 1741, 2008 CA 1742, 2008 CA 1743, 2008 CA 1744, 2008 CA 1745, 2008 CA 1746, 2008 CA 1747, 2008 CA 1748, 2008 CA 1749, 2008 CA 1750, 2008 CA 1751, 2008 CA 1752, 2008 CA 1753, 2008 CA 1754, 2008 CA 1755, 2008 CA 1756, 2008 CA 1757, 2008 CA 1758PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

IsThis is an appeal from a summary judgment ruling that a corporate taxpayer was liable for sales and use taxes for purchases related to its horse racing/offtrack betting/slot machine casino facility, dismissing the taxpayer’s claim for refund of taxes paid under protest, and holding that the taxpayer’s statutory basis for an alternate taxing regime was an “exemption” that had been suspended by LSA-R.S. 47:802(Q) and (R). For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On October 17, 2005, Harrah’s Bossier City Investment Company, L.L.C (“Har-rah’s”) filed the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. Hines v. GarrettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  3. Royal Ins. v. Romain Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Richard v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  5. Bunch v. Town of St. FrancisvilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrah's Bossier City Investment Co., LLC v. BridgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  2. HARRAH'S BOSSIER CITY INV. CO. v. BridgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  3. Harrah's Bossier City Investment Co. v. BridgesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API