Legal Opinion

Marvel v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 4, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The single issue raised by defendant in this appeal from a conviction for the sale of narcotic drugs in violation of 16 Del.C. § 4725 concerns the refusal by the Trial Court to charge on entrapment. After considering the pertinent parts of the record, the briefs and the arguments of counsel, we have concluded that the decision of the Trial Court was correct. Dobrosielski v. State, Del.Supr., 311 A.2d 875 (decided Sept. 17, 1973); Granville v. State, Del.Supr., 287 A.2d 652 (1972). Defendant’s reliance upon such cases as Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435, 53 S.Ct. 210, 77 L.Ed. 413…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  3. Granville v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  4. Dobrosielski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Conoco, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
  2. Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API